maleghasty: (Default)
[personal profile] maleghasty
Paul stared down at the scene from the catwalk above, trying to walk through the sequence of events in his mind, based on the resulting carnage.

The attacker must have entered to the left, shooting the first stiff in the back of the head as he walked past. This apparently casual act of violence clearly sent the remaining people in the room to seek cover – all of the overturned tables were pointing in that direction.

So the assailant, whoever they were, just kept walking, shooting as they went. The lack of bullet holes in the pieces of ‘cover’ that had corpses behind them suggested a high velocity load in his or her ammo, and a keen eye for shooting blind at a target behind cover. Whoever the assailant was, they had unparalleled confidence and actual ability with a gun.

One, two, three, four, five shots and five dead bodies. It was at this point that the only person left alive in the room apart from the mystery assailant was Smalley. He had only lived long enough to kneel and be stabbed thrice in the face.

---

You can see the original post on Ficlets.com by clicking here.

Date: 2008-07-01 10:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maleghast.livejournal.com
Not really... The 'Paul' as mentioned is looking down at the scene after it has happened. The narrative as told is his theory of what happened. Smalley is the only corpse that is named in the narrative.

It is evidently not clear __enough__ - I will chalk it up to experience and try to learn from it :-)

Thanks for commenting - I need people to comment as much when it's to tell me something doesn't work as when it does, so thanks - really I mean it :-D

Date: 2008-07-01 11:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caddyman.livejournal.com
I have to say it seemed perfectly clear to me.

Date: 2008-07-02 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thru-her-lens.livejournal.com
It seemed clear to me too, but the last paragraph seems awkward, somehow. Not sure how to explain it though, so will re-read tomorrow and see if it's clearer then.

Date: 2008-07-02 07:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sister-savage.livejournal.com
It's much clearer to me this morning. :-)

Date: 2008-07-02 07:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sister-savage.livejournal.com
Seriously, it's only the last paragraph that I had a problem with.

I knew caffeine would help!

Date: 2008-07-02 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sister-savage.livejournal.com
I have worked it out - I must have had a mental block! When you say "It was at this point...", you don't mean while Paul is looking at the scene, you mean after five shots were fired, before Paul is there.

I thought he was stabbed while Paul was in the room, which is why I thought that Paul was either the killer (lending a twist) or Paul was Smalley.

*satisfied with Self*

Profile

maleghasty: (Default)
maleghasty

July 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718 1920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 09:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios